Friday, May 20, 2011

Giving In Not Up


The kitchen, bath, and design trades  are unique in that what is really being sold is a design or idea.  Unlike a retail store, most often our customers complain about the services, promises, and design concepts, not the merchandise.  Of course, there are those who complain about the difference in color from the cabinets in your showroom as opposed to the cabinets she was provided, but for the most part the complaints are about your designs, layouts, measurements and promises.  Your designs, ideas and other non-tangible work is valuable and you should not be forced to give refunds or discounts to your clients simply because they complain. On the other hand, when you are wrong must be willing to provide reasonable reparations to your client. The tricky part is knowing when to fold and when to fight. 

Dealing with tangible items was once easy.  For example, if someone ordered light brown cabinets but you provided dark brown, the problem was clear cut as was the solution.  You simply would replace the cabinets at no charge. However, is this day and age, things are not so simple. Most customers complain about the impact of the delay in replacing the wrong color cabinets.  They claim that they are entitled to loss of use or make other esoteric legal arguments. More importantly, many customers are looking for you to make even the slightest mistake in the hopes that they can complain and receive a partial refund.

The four main complaints/allegations made by customers against kitchen and bath companies and designers are: (1) Verbal promises made before or after the contract is signed; (2) Incorrect measurements (even when they were present when measured); (3) Improper/inadequate designs; and (5) Loss of Use/Emotional Distress.

When your customer comes to you and requests a credit because your measurements were off by an inch or because you verbally suggested that the customer's order could arrive before the scheduled date when in reality it does not arrive until three days after the scheduled date how do you decide whether to give the credit or fight the customer?
           
The following guidelines should be used in determining whether to give in to a complaining customer.  

First, you must fully understand the customer's issues.  Many customers rant and rave and say nothing about their actual problem. You need to get a handle on the customer's real complaint.  Ask the customer to put his/her complaints in an e-mail or other form of writing.  If the claims involve some visible problem (i.e. improper installation; poor design; damage to the home; etc.) you should ask to physically inspect the conditions and photograph them.

Next you need to determine if the claims have merit. For example, if you contract does not have a time is of the essence clause and the customer complains because her cabinets arrived 7 days after the expected delivery date, she may not have a valid cause of action and thus, her threats are devoid of merit and you should offer nothing.  You may need to speak with an a attorney to analyze the merit of the claim.

You then need to review your file, notes and other documents as well as speaking to any employees or subcontractors who worked on the job to see if you in fact created the customer's problem (i.e. did you actually incorrectly measure the room).  If you did, the customer should be entitled to some reasonable form of compensation.  Reasonable means that which remedies the problem you created.  It does not mean that you should give the customer the whole project for free.  For example, if you incorrectly measure the height of a kitchen island, reorder the island at no charge and offer a percentage off the original cost of the island, not the who kitchen.

If you have verbal confirmation or written documentation proving that you made no mistakes, you now need to weigh the customer's demands with the cost of litigation.  For example, if a customer claims she is owed $500 due to a mistake that you did not make you may decide that it is a better business decision to pay the $500 since the cost of litigation would exceed the demand even if you win.  Conversely, if the demand is $25,000 and you did nothing wrong and can prove it, you need to fight the customer to the end. 

Please note, however, that giving in does not mean giving up.  If you do give a credit to your customer you have to be prepared for the customer to ask for more.  Remember the old adage, "If you give an inch they will take a mile." You need to be ready to refuse any further refunds and defend your position in court, if necessary.

It is important to keep emotion out of your decision to provide a credit or refund.  You need to view it as a business decision only.  In order to do this, you must understand the customer's complaint, your potential liability, and the true cost of settling vs. fighting it in court. Remember, that the best defense to these claims is having a proper contact that addresses your liability when certain problems occur.

           

2011 A&D Opening Night Recap

Each year the Architects & Designers Building throws an Opening Night party that spotlight each showroom in its best light. This year's festivities kicked off with 35 showroom events and countless fixtures and furnishings to enhance your home. Upon entering the 200,000 square foot building, we noticed a bot of a shift from last year. Perhaps it was the wet weather, but the hallways were a little less populated. There were still plenty of people...just not so much as 2010 (see "Opening Night at Architects & Designers Building"). Regardless of the shift in attendance, many of the participating showrooms did not disappoint.

Best Showroom Experience: Miele & GE Monogram

It is always a pleasure to attend the Miele showroom because they know how to do it up. Featuring polished appliances and innovative technology, Miele wowed guests with savory bites from Top Chef, Angelo Sosa. To experience the Miele showroom is fuse luxe fixtures with a posh lounge-like setting. Its modernity is a truly unbelievable experience that takes premium appliances to the next level.

Just a floor above was another appliance showroom making a splash. The GE Monogram Design Center knows how to keep guests entertained. With an amazing showroom, gorgeous interior vignettes, to styled kitchens and flat screen televisions (allows for demonstration close ups), all design styles can find inspiration here. With their own Executive Chef (Tageré Southwell), GE Monogram kept festivities going with mixes by DJ Gatsby and an unforgettable experience.

Best Showroom Design: Bilotta Kitchens

No showroom captivated our attention quite like Bilotta Kitchens. If Charlotte York (character from Sex and the City) were real, she would fall in love with their Rutt Classic collection. The blue cabinetry paired with marble counters created such an exquisite kitchen. Did we mention how functional this cooking space was? The kitchen cabinets alone could store every dish in two Manhattan apartments. And the adjacent seating area? Gorgeous! Bilotta Kitchens demonstrated a consistency in luxury and sophistication that was unrivaled at the Opening Night event.

Honorable Mention: Davis & Warshow-Kitchen & Bath Center

If one product stole the show it was a "little" toilet at the Davis & Warshow-Kitchen & Bath Design Center. Only on display at the A&D Building, the NUMI toilet by Kohler takes toilet technology to the next level. NUMI amenities include: motion activated lid, bidet, deodorizer, heated seat and feet warmer, music attributes and more.

All in all the 2011 A&D Opening Night party was a wonderful event full of great design. Our critique? To make this a more closed event. It seems that every year we notice more of a focus on the passed hors d'oeuvres than the actual design. Want to see more photos of the event? Visit our Facebook Fanpage.

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

NORDAM Sues Cessna Over Custom Cabinetry Contract

By Karen Koenig                                                                                                                                                          
 Print Page


NORDAM sues Cessna over custom cabinetry contract

May 01, 2011

TULSA, OK — Custom woodworker and aerospace component supplier NORDAM Group filed a lawsuit against Cessna Aircraft Co. last month, alleging breach of contract.



NORDAM claims Cessna’s attempt to transfer to a competitor its intellectual property for the CJ4 jet interior cabinetry will result in more than $30 million in damages to the Tulsa, OK-based company.

U.S. Chief District Judge Claire Eagan has set a hearing for May 5 on NORDAM’s preliminary injunction. The suit was filed April 21 in U.S. District Court in Tulsa. The previous month, Cessna had informed NORDAM that the CJ4 cabinetry portion of their agreement had been “shopped around” — NORDAM would lose the business to a competitor unless it lowered its prices by 20 percent.


NORDAM has been working with Cessna on the CJ4 executive cabinetry since 2007. The set consists of a refreshment center, lavatory, closets, aft dividers and bulkheads, armrests, side ledges and tables. The cabinetry is manufactured in NORDAM’s 120,000-square-foot facility in Wichita, KS.

NORDAM employs more than 2,000 people and has nine facilities in three continents. In addition to manufacturing the custom cabinetry, NORDAM designs, certifies and manufactures integrated propulsion systems, nacelles and thrust reversers for business jets and manufactures aircraft transparencies, including cabin windows, wing-tip lenses and simulator screens.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...